There are a large amount of websites on the market that use the word "future" within their domain name, but are they really futurist type websites? It is preferred often by print publishers and editors that the phrase "future" is an excellent word to use in titles, since it grabs people's attention. But, when people use the word future and then do not give predictions or future accounts, then are they really deceiving the viewer and web-surfer. I believe they are.
Recently, an editor of a future of things type website asked me to publish a column, but in reviewing the internet site I discovered it to be underwhelming on the futuristic aspect, and more heavy to the scientific news arena. Indeed, if the magazine is intent on "The Future" then why are all the articles about new scientific innovations in the current period or happening right now? - asked myself.
www.chatrush.com
raadpleger.nl
https://678-hd.com/
www.naiwaennet.com
It appears like they're intent on scientific discovery that's already happened, not what will maintain the future. That is just boring, more science news, regurgitation, typical human tactic of re-packaging information. I believe they could do better, but are holding themselves back, afraid to produce people think, worried that you will get too much from your own mainstream, quote "core" group of viewers, which I believe they cannot even understand.
Of course, as an entrepreneur, I am aware why they do it this way. It is because they wish to generate income and thus sink to a lower degree of readership, while still pretending to fairly share the future of stuff. Once the editor wished to protect such comments, the indication was that your website was mostly about scientific news.
Yes, I observe that your website is certainly caused by a news site and I ask what does which have regarding the future of stuff? Shouldn't the internet site be called NSIN.com or something like that; for New Science Innovation News? If your website is about Science News and is a collection of everyone else's news, then it is really a copy site of a style that is already getting used and not unique. Thus, the content is therefore the exact same, so even though the articles are written more clearly and easier to know, that is nice, still what is the value to a "science news junky" as you can find very few articles on the webpage compared with their competition?
Should they called them selves a news site, then you could have "futurist type columnists" anyway, who might project these scientific news items into the future or they may keep consitently the "Future Stuff" motif and promote the futurist columnists.
This would be a lesson to all or any "Futuristic" type websites as a case study. If you take the future thinkers to your website and have nothing to exhibit them, they'll leave. If you utilize trickery to have regular readers there, you're doing an extreme disservice to the future of mankind, by promoting present inventions since the be all end all. In any event, it's unethical to make use of this tactic on future of things type websites.
No comments:
Post a Comment